Attachment Theory and Child Essay

An bond paper is a two-way emotional bond in which plurality depend on each other for their sense of security. Although we forma fond regards through bewilder out our lives, psychologists argon particualry interested in the extensions formed between a peasant and his/her radical phencyclidine.1 This essay will examine the role of attachment in electric razorhood and its subsequent formation of sexual relationships.Most babies of mammals exhibit the give tongue to(prenominal) patterns as human infants they seek proximity to the mother and react with anxeity on seperation from her, which is the essense pf attachment behaviour. John bowlby believed that attachment was an innate pattern and it helped infants to survive. Bowlby had observed how pamper monkeys reacted with distress on sepearation from their mother for a brief period. The mother and fumble both called for each other. This shows that attachment is essential for survival however, it preserve be argued that qu ery relating to animals cannot be generalize to humans.Bowlbys theory of attachment is that tiddlerren flip a biological need to attach to their main phencyclidine as attachment helps serve the purpose of survival. The emotional relationship provides the infant with a set of expectations about relationships which stays with the minor throughout life this is cognise as the internal operative model, and is a pattern for relationships the child w happen up angiotensin-converting enzymethorn have in the future. If the child experiences love and affection, he/she will come to see him/herself as worthy of love and attention. This is the childs working model as Bowlby sees it. The working model will determine the childs relationship with other people and the way the child sees him/herself in the future. On the other hand, if the child experiences neglect or rejectionthey may trail a working model that is based on denial kind of than on reality. Such a working model may head neg atively to the the mental health of the child and the quality of their relationships with others in the future.bloody shame Ainsworth was a US psychologist who operationalised Bowlbys concept so that it could be tested empirically. She devised an experimental procedure called the stange line, which resulted in the classificatin of attachment patterns. In the eerie land site an observer shows the caregiver and child into a board and indeed leaves. The caregiver watches the child play and a stranger soon enters the room. The stranger sits silently at first then talks with the caregiver and then tries to act with the child.The caregiver leaves the room. This is he first seperation between the caregiver and the child. While the caregiver is absent the stranger continues trying to interact with the child. The caregiver returns and is reunited withnthe child. The stranger then leaves the room and the caregiver follows leaving the child alone. This is the second seperation. The stra nger enters the room and once again tries to interact with the child. The caregiver returns for a second reunification and the stranger leaves. The findings resulted in the classification of three attachment parts discussed below.Attachment figure A, avoidant, is when the child shows ap elicit indifference when the caregiver leaves the room, and avoids contact when the caregiver returns. The child is apparently not afraid of strangers. Mothers of event A children tend to be in comminuted and do not seem interested in their childs play. Attachment type B, securely attached, is when the child is upset when the caregiver leaves and is happy to see the caregiver return. The child is easily comforted by the caregiver.The mothers of type B children are very intersted in their childs play and actively support and communicate with the child during play. Attachment type C, ambivalent is when the child is very upset when the caregiver leaves the room, however, the caregiver finds it thorn y to sooth the child when they return. The child seeks comfort but at the same cartridge holder rejects it. mothers of type C children are inconsistent in their reactions to their children.Ainsworth concluded that the primary caregivers behaviour determines the attachment type of the child. A sensitive primary caregiver breaths to a securely attached child. Insecure attachment will lead to problems in later life. Jerome Kagan (1982) suggested that innate differences in childrens temperaments influence how the environment interacts with them. Another impact on attachment is the family luck that a child is part of. Achilds socio-economic environment has a major(ip) impact on the attachment type the child has. If a family is hit by povery the child may not recieve the necessary support and this could lead to a change in the attachment type. A risk part in the development of mental health seems to be a escape of formation of attachment to distinguished people during childhood.Acco rding to Goldberg (2000), the method is a unique combination of experimental and clinical methods. He he finds it a well standardised procedure which allows for natural interactions. Lamb (1985) claims that this widely utilise methodology is highly artificial and extrememly limited in terms of the occur of information gathered, and that it fails to take into circular the mothers behaviour. Marrone (1998) finds that although the strange blot has been criticized for being stressful-and indeed unethical- it is modelled on normal everyday circumstances when the caregiver must leave the infant for brief periods of timein unlike circumstances. However, it can be argued that exposing children to stress in experimental situations can be very different to everyday life.Van ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) carried out a major review of 32 world wide studies, involving eight countries and over 2000 infants. They found that there are differences within cultures in the distribution of type s A,B and C. For example, Japanese studies showed complete absence of type A, but a high proportion of type C. There sems to be a pattern of cross-cultural differences, so that type B is the roughly common cross-culturally. Type A is reletively more(prenominal) common in westbound European countries, and type C is reletively more common in Japan. He differences has been associated with differences in child-rearing. The results of these studies indicated that if we want valid interpretations of the strange situaton in a cross-cultural setting, we need to have good knowlege about child rearing.The cross-cultural harshness of the strange situation methods of assesing attachment and the blind drunking of the classification classifications themselves has been questioned. The meaning of the strange situation has been challenged, in that it focuses on o the measurement of the attachment in terms of the infants reaction to the seperation and the subsequent reunion with the caregiver. I t does not take into account that the meaning of seperation may differ across cultures. Japanese children are rarely seperated from their primary caregivers and so the seperation may be a very strange situation for the child. this may mean something completely different to Japanese mothers and children than to American infants and mothers.Bowlbys internal working model assumes that although the model can be modified, it remains relativey stable throughout the lifespan. Hazen and Shaver (1987) were one of the first researchers to explore Bowlbys attachment theory in relation to adult romantic relationships. They found the attachment theory a rich perspective on adult love because it could explain both optimistic and negative emotions.Hazen and Shaver translated Ainsworths three attachment styles to make them desirable for adult relationships. Then they devised a love quiz in a local newspaper and ask respondents to indicate which of the three patterns best exposit their feelings toward romantic relationships. A self selected sample of 620 people, aged 14-82 years, responded to the love quiz. The mean age was 36 years. There were 205 males and 415vfemales. A second study utilise a sample of 108 college students. The researchers found that 60% of the respondants showed a secure attachment style and 20% showed the anxious ambivalent pattern, and 20% showed the anxious avoident pattern. The research also asked the respondents to describe their parents parenting style. People who were seecurely attached had said their parents were responsive and attentive, people who were anxious-ambivalant had rejecting and inattentive parent.Hazen and Shaver theorised that romantic love shares important similarities with early attachment relationships. They also found that differences in adult attachment wre related to how people felt about themselves. Although the researchers found some correlation coefficient between parenting style and attachment paterns, they went agains t drawing too many conclusions as this would be deterministic. In fact, it seems that as people get older, they are more likely to to be able to develop their own outlook and onward motion to life.The study was ased on a self selected sample and can therefore not be representative. Self report data is not ceaselessly reliable, and since the study was carried out in the western world it cannot be generalised to everybody across different cultures.It can be seen through the strange situation that majority of infants are likely to develop an attachment type B, although, it is mostly dependant on factors such as temperment, socio-economic factors, and parent styles. In addition, it can also be seen that the attachment style developed as a child can have a large impact on the attachment style involved in the formation of subsequent parent relationships.