.

Thursday, December 13, 2018

'Esr Class Presentation – Week V\r'

' electron spin resonance Class Presentation †Week V ( family 12& 13 2011) 1. casefuls for Discussion (David J. Fritzsche): * It’s Your Turn (page 109) * Kader Industrial (Thailand) Company- Case 10 (page 182) * Muebles Fino Buenos- Case 11 (page 184) 2. â€Å"It’s Your Turn” †enthral reaction the question in the last line utilise the attach toing ethical frameworks: (a) Categorical unconditional; (b) precept Utilitarian; (c) Veil of Ignorance; and (d) scrap Utilitarianism. * Categorical Imperative: If you have a contract with another party, conform to this contract. No matter what.Especially if the other party is calculation on you, beca expenditure they should go bankrupt. Humanity: Fulfill your contract, lesson duty. * Rule Utilitarianism: Follow through with your contract. Don’t aban male p atomic number 18nt multitude/companies with who you have agreed to suspensor/work with. * Veil of Ignorance: You have limited come of res ources, so you have to trade name the preference for genius of the 2 clients. Keep producing for the old client, except use the rest of your capacity to start producing for the new magnanimous genius. What if??? The interior(prenominal) customer only scores the contract if you post produce everything in the first month. hose for domestic one, 2 happy vs. 1 bad * Act Utilitarianism: More positives vs. best negatives. Ok you make one party really unhappy, but still this is the just about honest for the close to peoples. 3. Case 10: that Questions 4, 5, 7 & 8. * 4: Lock the doors, no safety regulations or fire escapes. Cloth finale to electrical transformer. No alarms. If you lock doors, make genuine that you can open them really fast at all times. Building disintegrated quickly (poor construction, steel beams) * 7: Business aimed, only profit matters…. Don’t look at the people as humans, but use them as machines.They even asked their workers to keep op erative while on that point was a small fire. perchance even hostile, locking doors etc. * 5: well-grounded: Board, managers… should have safety regulations. Government, Safety and health government in Thailand (from government). Moral: * 8: Only sign contract if you know that the operative conditions are ok, that t here are safety regulations etc. company should at least follow the country regulations for safety codes, twist rules etc. , if you ask more of the company, they won’t be open to give you the cheap labor. ut point in the middle Class… where would you determine the line, what are the moral/social obligations for the customers before sign language any contracts? 4. Case 11: Only Questions 3, 4, 6, and 7. * 3: They didn’t follow all the environmental rules of the state. ulcerated for the employees to work there. Just switching countries because they didn’t motivation to invest in the machines/other processing methods and to skirt the fines. So fire a lot of people to get new employees at 1/8 of the be. Is this even outsourcing? Or really moving your solid company somewhere else. * 4: Pollution vs. working conditions.A lot of pollution vs. good paid jobs. As long as there are good safety regulations and compensations for health. * 6: Egoism view: YES 😉 because you make more profits and you don’t cautiousness about the pollution. But… you pay your employees less than in California, so you can invest a morsel more in environmental issues. Deontology (don’t do to anybody else what you don’t want them to do to you): balk in America and fix your pollution problems, because you don’t want to get fined and you don’t want your employees to get ill. * 7: Make sure enough they follow the ideals and make sure that you have leave office high environmental standards.But a lot of decadency in Mexico so make sure the companies follow your standards by controlling the m yourself. Because a lot of American companies will go to Mexico (because of rising environmental standards in US) build some parks and green zones to uphold the people who live there to be able to live healthy, outside all the pollution. 5. Assume that miffed by charges re the happenings of Foxcon in China, Apple Inc. has asked you to adumbrate a memo on the subject of an ISO standard to be applied to high-tech contract manufacturers of high-end electronic items.Re set yourself to 6 standards and explain your choice. 6. The Medical Council of Singapore has asked you to gulping 3 ethics principles relating to the outsourcing of medical work to India. Please identify what, in your opinion, are the three most important principles and explain the purpose behind your choice and the specific content of such principles. Firms Find a Haven From U. S. Environmental Rules : Commerce: Hundreds of companies set up shop in Mexico, where regulation is less strict and wages are low. THE FREE -TRADE DILEMMA: The environmental costs of a U. S. Mexico pact. Third in a four-part series. beside: How will free trade affect El Pasos smoggy skies? November 19, 1991|JUDY PASTERNAK | TIMES STAFF WRITER â€Å"We are rewriting history here. It was only recently that anyone here started to care about the environment. It will take time. ” The taciturnity troubles EPA officials who deal regularly with SEDUE. Said one, who spoke on the condition of anonymity: â€Å"This is a situation where the economic activity has gotten way ahead of the regulatory activity. ” * http://articles. latimes. com/1991-11-19/ give-and-take/mn-70_1_environmental-rules/4\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment