Running head : CIVIL RIGHTSCivil Rights in the United conjures from 1950 to 2006John Q . StudentW skillful give tongue to UniversityCivil Rights in the United States from 1950 to 2006One would hope that the United States would have entered the fifties with the difficulties of discrimination and race relations behind them . After to each iodine , the Civil War had been fought and the Thirteenth , Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments , away righteousnessing thraldom , prohibiting the infringement of rights without due process and guaranteeing the right to right to vote to every last(predicate) male citizens respectively had been had been passed and ratified early in the reconstruction process . Sadly this was not to be the graphemeOn January 1 , 1950 the grooming system was largely segregated in areas with a high school pop ulation of African Americans , the branches of the military had unless recently been incorporate and lacquerese raft who were innate(p) in Japan , no matter how long they had lived in the United States and how umteen children had been born here into United States citizens were not blush allowed to cod for citizenship . batch of African descent were not allowed to exercise their right in the in the south to vote due to top taxes , literacy tests , and covert dirty action . Throughout the United States house discrimination prevented nonage citizens from purchasing houses in segregated areas . The impressive law of the demean was not the above mentioned amendments , but was prime on a decision handed down by the Supreme chat up of the United States (SCOTUS fifty-four geezerhood earlier in the oddball of Plessy v . Ferguson . In this upshot the Supreme Court had upheld a Louisiana State law of nature that required railroads to provide friction matchize but separat e accommodations for blanched and colored r! aces and prohibited people from occupying any cars other than the one designated by the railroad (Hall ,. 637-8 .
This law was only one among numerous Jim Crow laws that existed throughout the South that efficaciously promoted separatism in reality places such as restaurants theaters , sports facilities and in education . SCOTUS rule that such laws was constitutional and that disengagement of races did not inherently purport that one race was expecting(p) or treated unfairly . In addition umpire Brown wrote in the majority doctrine that laws could not collapse the long-established customs of society . He reassert his decision based on a long quarter of SCOTUS decisions beginning with the 1849 case of Roberts v . City of Boston which related directly to public schools . By making this ruling SCOTUS effectively had effectively eliminated the catch protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in regards to raceIn the 1950s supporters of equal rights for all races prepared to attack Plessy v . Ferguson . On ovalbuminthorn 17 , 1954 SCOTUS ruled that Segregation of white and Negro children in the public schools of a State wholly on the understructure of race , pursuant to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation , denies to Negro children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment - even though the physical facilities and other tangible factors of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my p! aper