When President Bill Clinton reluctantly signed the Personal bureau and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, he had an estimate of what the critical responses would be. The wish was to induce a program that would receive significant receiptss to the needy and hungery people of our country. However, the response and criticisms are resembling to what our president expected, very negative. Mary Jo terror believes the new benefit law poses serious dangers to poor children and families. As assistant repository for children and families in the Department of Health and charitable services, she supported the administrations efforts to focus the welfare system on deed and to increase verbalise flexibility through the waiver process. But in the kind of reviewing state welfare reform proposals, she became concerned that politics and pecuniary pressures were energy states into a race to the bottom(Bane). As tenacious as the gray-headed law was in place the federal government could swan on guaranteed assistance and protections for recipients.
Her fears ab fall out what would determine to poor children when states were no longer required to provide the base assurances and protections we insisted on in waiver demonstrations led her to resign later on President Clinton signed the welfare bill (Bane). The reform takes aside national level responsibilities and puts the gold and responsibility into the individual states. A good amount of flexibility is provided, which whitethorn or may not result in a positive manner. For instance, they ! property could be used on the engagement reform and trouble preparation, eon others could find loopholes in the laws, and while their purposes may not be malicious, the money would not genuinely be carrying out the role intended. No longer go out exchange assistance to dependent children be...If you want to get a encompassing essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper