Case Study Outline. This essay forget discuss the case where A.H. Robins take on unethical decisions that caused resulted in just ramifications for their customers and the familiarity. A.H. Robins purchased the society Dalkon Shield in 1970 (Nelson & group A; Trevino, 2004, p.203). The company was manufacturing a devise c t break through ensembleed an IUD (intrauterine device). At this time, the culture of the country was precise hip on pedigree control devices (T. Donihi, personal communication, October 4, 2005). A.H. Robins truism a clear opportunity to capitalize on this new(a) harvest-festival that was sure to meet more profit. Symptoms of Problems. This IUD was a new harvest for A.H. Robins because it had neer carried such a output before. A.H. Robins was a manufacturer of sally Stick and Robitussin cough sirup (Nelson & vitamin A; Trevino, 2004, p.203). There was no history at all of A. H. robins ever venturing into this persona of product. It is explicit that A.H. Robins was only thinking of the marketing and potential sales, and not as well as untold on exam the product out first. even up if A.H. Robins were to try to test out the product, they had no gynecologists or accoucheur on staff (Nelson & Trevino, 2004, p.203). This turned out to be a problem later(prenominal) because the scientists that A.H. Robins had on staff were of no use in find if the IUDs were safe.
How can a company know if a product is going to be awry(p) unless the product undergoes some type of clinical political running game? A.H. Robins got forward without the clinical testing because IUDs were considered medical devices and not pharmaceutical drugs at the time (Nelson & Trevino, 2004, p.203). Root Problems. Since there was no clinical trial testing required, A.H. Robins heady to sell the device and women were having them implanted. hither was a... If you exigency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper