The Case Of Griggs V. Duke Power Company - 1047 Words

NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Student: Dana Holbert THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED IN Holbert, D 1 MSOL-5903: Legal Issues in Human Resources Management Analyze the Impact of Employment and Human Resources Laws Dr. Melody Rawlings #1 Faculty Use Only Analyze the Impact of Employment and Human Resources Laws Dana Holbert North Central University July 09, 2017 Authors Note Dana M. Holbert, Student Studying, This research is supported by Northcentral University MSOL-5903 course Week 1 In the case of Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), the company chose to set employment standards in which the†¦show more content†¦The company denied any accusations and the employee stated it was no voluntary and the respondent did, in fact, pursue the supervisor as well. The Court of Appeals overturned that a violation of Title VII may predicate on either of two types of sexual harassment, employment benefits on sexual favors, and a hostile or offensive working environment. As to the bank s liability, the Court of Appeals held that an employer is liable for sexual harassment by supervisory personnel, whether or not the employer knew or should have known about it. US Supreme Court (1986) In the case of Steelworkers v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979), the affirmative Action Plan was assigned to the workforce stating that the skilled worker would train to fill the positions of craft workers. In doing so, the production worker felt like the scales were not balanced, and their jobs are given to the black employees. Kaiser, chose to train in-house workers using 50% of the trainees who were black until the percentage of black skilled craft workers in the plant approximated the percentage of blacks in the local labor force. The hiring process caused an issue among the other skilled workers when they noticed that six blacks hired and only five whites hired. After that, respondent Weber, one of those white production workers, instituted this class action in Federal District Court. Alleging because the affirmative action program had resulted in junior black employees Show MoreRelatedThe Aftermath of Griggs vs. Duke Power Company Case1108 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 (1971) was a case of significant importance for civil rights. Before Title VII was implemented in the year, 1964, Duke Power had demonstrated history of discrimination against black employees by keeping them at low pay or not employing them. It was in 1955 that the company developed a policy where the r equirements to be placed or promoted in the company to higher paying jobs required a high school diploma. Although this policy had no impact on black workers alreadyRead MoreRuling in the Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Case688 Words   |  3 PagesSynopsis: Duke Power, a company being sued by its ethnic minority employees this included Willie Griggs. Griggs would be filing the class action law suit along with several of his fellow co-workers for unfair processes in which attaining a promotion or higher paying position was met by having a high school diploma and undergoing IQ testing. Prior to the civil rights act Blacks were only allowed to work in the company’s labor department, which happened to harbor its lowest paying positions as wellRead MoreEthical Considerations1331 Words   |  6 Pageslawsuits presented in Chapter 20 of the text, this writer chose two lawsuits that violate standards in which important future cases were based upon due to the outcomes of these cases. The first case is that within an employment setting in which testing was used to determine employee performance, yet was considered to not be valid or reliable. Griggs vs. Duke Power Company, 1971 brought to question if the testing that was being used to hol d back African Americans from higher paying positions was validRead MoreBam 411 Human Resource Management Unit 1 Examination801 Words   |  4 Pages ) Email us At: Support@homeworklance.com or lancehomework@gmail.com 1. ________ plan training activities. †¢ Managers †¢ Training specialists †¢ Corporate teachers †¢ Job analysts 2. ________ organize the training opportunities for a company. †¢ EEO representatives †¢ Trainings specialists †¢ Change managers †¢ Communication directors 3. The ________ HR group may provide specialized support for organizational change. †¢ centers of expertise †¢ embedded †¢ corporate †¢ transactional Read MoreTitle Vii Of The Civil Rights Act1111 Words   |  5 Pagesdata presented in front of me and follow company policy and procedures to make a decision. Discuss the important precedents set by Griggs v. Duke Power Company. How would you handle a complaint of this type? Have you encountered this in your workplace? Griggs v. Duke Power Company was â€Å"a landmark case because the Supreme Court used to define unfair discrimination† (Dressler, 2015, p. 30). There are three critical guidelines which came out of this case: †¢ Discrimination does not have to be overtRead MoreThe Impact Of Employment Law On The Human Resources Arena927 Words   |  4 Pages(Dessler, p.32, 2013). We discussed how the The Griggs v. Duke Power Company was a paramount case because it set the precedent in defining unfair discrimination (Dessler, p.34, 2013). It required employers to assess the job and only seek the criteria needed to complete the task, to prove the criteria is necessary to do the job, and the plaintiff does not have to prove discrimination was intentional but discrimination did happen, period. Duke Power Company had claimed applicants needed a high schoolRead MoreSocial Equity and Diversity Management1918 Words   |  8 Pagesdiscrimination. There are several court cases that are relevant in both EEO and AA compliance. Griggs v. Duke Power Company was the first major case to be tried under Civil Rights Act of 1964. Willie Griggs filed a class action, on behalf of several fellow African- American employees, against his employer Duke Power Company. Griggs challenged the power company’s transfer policy, requiring employees who want to work in any job other than manual labor. Griggs claimed that the test discriminated againstRead MoreThe Chicano And Black Civil Rights Movement1610 Words   |  7 PagesBlack Civil rights movement was employment, and discrimination in the workplace. First, a case pertaining to this issue during the Chicano movement was Bernal v. Fainter in the year 1984. This was a case where the Supreme Court of the United States  «Ã‚  ruled that the Equal Protection Clause prohibited the state of Texas from barring noncitizens from applying for commission as a notary public. » The result of this case came about, as the court realized, that there is no requirement for a notary to be a citizenRead MoreJob Analysis: Human Resource Manager at Johnson Enterprises1797 Words   |  7 Pagesimplications of job analysis (including citing at least one court case that ruled on selection practices) The most recent court cases that ruled on selection practices are the HYPERLINK http://laws.findlaw.com/us/400/542.htmlPhillips v. Martin Marietta Corp. and HYPERLINK http://laws.findlaw.com/us/401/424.htmlGriggs v. Duke Power Co. In regards to HYPERLINK http://laws.findlaw.com/us/400/542.htmlPhillips v. Martin Marietta Corp. Case, the court ruled that employers should not discriminate employeesRead MoreIssues in Psychological Testing Worksheet831 Words   |  4 Pagesvalidates the importance of the technical quality of tests. Validity, reliability, and adequacy are no longer concepts used for the professional psychometric expert, these are concepts written into laws. The concepts have become benchmarks in court cases (Hogan, 2007). Another issue of psychological test is for the applicability of tests to various subgroups. People with disabilities and racial/ethnic subgroups are of particular interest. Conducting validity studies, test content development, and